Topic: Beam element numbering in results
Dear all,
I think it will be better to have the real (input deck) number of a beam element in the line:
Element output:
---------------
beam element 1 : <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<------------------------
...
instead of a progressive numbering. In fact the reported result happens even when in the input deck I have:
Beam3d 6 nodes 2 1 2 mat 1 ....
If I remember well Mikael did something similar the Quad1MindlinShell3D output, but I cannot find out where the modification was done in Git repo, neither the posts related.
It will be best to have the "real" input number for all elements in the results.
Thanks,
Giovanni