tailorcrete:examples:dra_wall_01
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revisionNext revisionBoth sides next revision | ||
tailorcrete:examples:dra_wall_01 [2012/11/14 12:52] – kolarfil | tailorcrete:examples:dra_wall_01 [2012/11/16 08:53] – bp | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
==== Description of the problem ==== | ==== Description of the problem ==== | ||
- | The whole simulation is modeled as a 2D problem. On the threee | + | The simulation is modeled as a 2D problem. On the pictures below, |
| {{: | | {{: | ||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
\\ | \\ | ||
- | In case of pipe casting from the side, concrete is filled in through the pipe, as it is shown at Fig. 1.b. Diameter | + | In case of bottom |
+ | |||
+ | The material parameters of used concrete are following: | ||
+ | | yield stress | 50 [Pa] | | ||
+ | | plastic viscosity | 50 [Pa*s]| | ||
+ | | densty | 2300 [kg/m3]| | ||
Streamlines at different stages of solutions | Streamlines at different stages of solutions | ||
Line 25: | Line 30: | ||
===== Bottom casting from center ===== | ===== Bottom casting from center ===== | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== Description of the problem ==== | ||
+ | In this case, the casting has been performed from the outlet located at the bottom part at the centre. The figures of computational mesh and model are shown below. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |{{: | ||
+ | | Fig. 2.a: Computational model | Fig. 2.b: Computational mesh | | ||
+ | |||
+ | The material parameters were the same as in the case of pipe filling: | ||
+ | | yield stress | 50 [Pa] | | ||
+ | | plastic viscosity | 50 [Pa*s]| | ||
+ | | densty | 2300 [kg/m3]| | ||
+ | |||
+ | \\ | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
Streamlines at different stages of solutions | Streamlines at different stages of solutions | ||
| {{: | | {{: |
tailorcrete/examples/dra_wall_01.txt · Last modified: 2012/11/16 13:44 by bp