Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- tailorcrete:examples:dra_wall_01 [2012/11/14 13:55] – kolarfil
+++ tailorcrete:examples:dra_wall_01 [2012/11/16 08:53] – bp
@@ Line 2: / Line 2: @@
 ==== Description of the problem ====
-The whole simulation is modeled as a 2D problem. On the threee pictures below, geometry, computational model and mesh of the wall is shown.
+The simulation is modeled as a 2D problem. On the pictures below, the geometry, computational model and mesh of the wall is shown.
 | {{:tailorcrete:examples:dragados_drawing.jpg?200|}}|{{:tailorcrete:examples:dragados_model.png?200|}}| {{:tailorcrete:examples:dragados_mesh.png?200|}}|
@@ Line 8: / Line 8: @@
 \\
-In case of pipe casting from the side, concrete is filled in through the pipe, as it is shown at Fig. 1.b. Diameter of the pipe is 0.1 m (note, that is modeled as a 2D problem). Concrete is filled in with prescribed velocity equal to 0.2 m/s. It is modeled fith no-friction boundary condition on any wall. Boundary conditions on the holes are prescribed in local coordinate system where normal component of velocity is forbidden and tangent component is free. Material parameters of used concrete are:
+In case of bottom pipe casting from the side, concrete is filled in through the pipe (see Fig. 1.b). The diameter of the pipe is equal to 0.1 m (note, that is modeled as a 2D problem). Concrete is filled in with prescribed velocity equal to 0.2 m/s inside the pipe. No-friction bounadry conditions are assumed an all surfaces. Boundary conditions on the holes are prescribed in local coordinate system where normal component of velocity is forbidden and tangent component is free.
-  *yield stress 50 [Pa]
-  *plastic viscosity 50 [Pa*s]
+The material parameters of used concrete are following:
-  *densty 2300 [kg/m3]
+| yield stress | 50 [Pa] |
+| plastic viscosity | 50 [Pa*s]|
+| densty | 2300 [kg/m3]|
 Streamlines at different stages of solutions
@@ Line 30: / Line 32: @@
 ==== Description of the problem ====
-In this case, filling is modeled from the bottom center of the wall. Again, pictures of computational mesh and model are on the pictures below.
+In this case, the casting has been performed from the outlet located at the bottom part at the centre. The figures of computational mesh and model are shown below.
 |{{:tailorcrete:examples:dragados_model_down.png?200|}}| {{:tailorcrete:examples:dragados_mesh_down.png?200|}}|
 |  Fig. 2.a: Computational model  | Fig. 2.b: Computational mesh |
+The material parameters were the same as in the case of pipe filling:
+| yield stress | 50 [Pa] |
+| plastic viscosity | 50 [Pa*s]|
+| densty | 2300 [kg/m3]|
 \\
-In case of pipe casting from the side, concrete is filled in through the pipe, as it is shown at Fig. 1.b. Diameter of the pipe is 0.1 m (note, that is modeled as a 2D problem). Concrete is filled in with prescribed velocity equal to 0.2 m/s. It is modeled fith no-friction boundary condition on any wall. Boundary conditions on the holes are prescribed in local coordinate system where normal component of velocity is forbidden and tangent component is free.
 Streamlines at different stages of solutions